Photosynthesis and a veritable global warming.

Photosynthesis and a veritable global warming.
With a new set of rules for photosynthesis, how will become a global warming, especially the pole ice cap. Let's revise photosynthesis.
Water molecule is split not through a redox reaction but according to the manner of radicals. That is, no electric charge is involved, and all the output is exothermic.
For a water molecule, to be exothermic, here, it signifies that there is a change of the phase. Liquid to gaseous. That increases the pressure in the xylem, which will open the stomata. At full stomata rotation, a compound of root water, and new oxygen, and new water molecules will get out, faster, a lot faster than evaporation; and that stream would be visible, translucent to visible, at the highest altitude (snowflake in winter).
Not only that put some clouds in the sky but it also do a pressure that maintains the structures, say that they are included in a balloon (as there is no name I know). It is as with a balloon with holes. If you do not want your balloon be deflated then you have to put air continually.
There is lost of air molecules, at the poles, in favour of the cosmos, so the planet has to produce continually by photosynthesis the gases that eventually escape to the cosmos.
But not only gases are extracted from the planet, there is the heat.
A planet do lose heat... as for example, the moon next step will be to break apart in pieces; then the moon will form a ring around our planet; Mars too will explode into fragments under the cold of the cosmos, as the sun, as the whole galaxy once the energy is spent. While the planet is losing heat and matter, the clouds are supposed to bring snow to the pole north. The clouds that are pushed by the winds fail to send the precipitations over the ice cap.Vegetation does produce a stream of new molecules of water and oxygen mixed with fresh water, no coined word for that yet; with the rotating planet, there is a reaction called wind. That wind will push away the clouds; and that up to the pole north, as new vegetation will bring heat, and water, and ozone, so generating wind.
Ozone.
3O2, or 2O3, why the oxygen formed as single unit atom, combining in that stream would not form ozone?
In the context of exothermic output, globally the warming of the planet would signify that the output total of the planet photosynthesis is increasing. That signifies more clouds and heat and ozone. The Arctic Ocean will eventually be heated. But for now that ocean is colder than zero Celsius, and as the ice do melt at 0° Celsius, the ice cap will accumulate its precipitations up to that moment; by the time the ocean water temperature reach the critical point, the ice cap would have to be huge. So a huge polar ice cap would be for a real global warming! What is happening everywhere with the glaciers is a lack of snow, drought. Unless there is rain as precipitation, you can't say that a glacier is melting. A glacier is a system, with input-output. There must be snow or rain otherwise it is drought. Rain or drought will have a similar effect. Which one is the responsible of glacier melting? For me, as I am able to do, the ice cap is thin because worldwide 'desertification' is proceeding. It seems that worldwide, they fail with forestry. Otherwise there will be no inundation, or drought or tornado; and the tornadoes and hurricanes, probably, will be higher in altitude. Dwarf trees are the trees of tomorrow.
The Niger and a Jew near the Dead Sea have had some success with the desert. They succeeded where big cash-enterprise had failed. Would they get majestic forest in the future, I doubt.
What is the solution: to prime a forest with thinning, trimming, tree-seed planting and prescribed burning.

The cosmos will continue to get its share of heat without consideration. That! That is sure and certain.

Ouragans, tornadoes, jet stream via photosynthesis exothermic output

Hurricanes, tornadoes, jet stream.
Photosynthesis will produce new molecules that are exothermic. Splitting of water molecule does produce radicals: the hydroxyl and the hydrogen radicals.
To form an Oxygen molecule, you need four hydroxyls radicals, hence four water molecules to be split as for gaining a monomer or an oxygen molecule.
So, four hydroxyl radicals will become two water molecules and an oxygen molecule... 4[OH] --> 2H2O+O2. The four hydrogen radicals will ally with CO2 and any stuff from the elaborated sap (the elaborate sap goes down along a thin film being located between wood and the bark: phloem).
For each monomer, CO2+4[H] --> CH2O + H2O, we have a new water molecule. So, for each oxygen molecule done, there are three water molecules. All new molecules are exothermic. Why, since the radicals are short-live and endothermic, others molecules will be exothermic.

4H2O --> 4[OH] + 4[H]
-----
4[OH] --> 2H2O+O2
4[H] + CO2 --> CH2O + H2O

Root water and these new molecules (oxygen and water) will build a pressure, building the turgescence, and open the stomata system, bringing along more water from the roots, being the future cloud, going to the highest position of those clouds. During winter this are the snowflakes. How the pressure is increase. The new molecules being hot gases would have to have a bigger volume if they were not included in the bulk of water. The overall production of photosynthesis around the planet will maintained as a balloon against the cosmos. At the poles, there is a loss of molecules year round. The magnetic field of the earth is filled with plasma. These molecules forming the plasma have to come from somewhere. These molecules, the plasma, will not stay permanently in the magnetic field; they will be spilled in the universe.
Before, the gases will form as structures around the planet. These structures do need an active process as to be functioning: new molecule production that builds a pressure. So, as photosynthesis, the process affecting those structures out there, is affected by water and water is affected by the moon, then the moon is a factor for photosynthesis production, for the maintaining of the structures. When there is a weakness in the structures, the hurricanes and the tornadoes are there.The hurricanes will arise when the production of photosynthesis is at minimum; when at the planet year rotation around the sun and at the position of the moon, the vegetation is having its weakest production of the photosynthesis. Tornadoes will appear when locally there is a very weak production of photosynthesis.

Moon has two manners of influencing photosynthesis: light and attraction. If you crosscheck your observations of the temperature, in respect to the moon relative position, you will have good predictions ahead.

A hot sea and a cold sea.
A reduced population of unicellulars, able of photosynthesis, a hot sea will have. A hot sea is where hurricane will begin because there is no production of new molecules by living organisms. The hurricane will be stopped when meeting a cold sea. How, I don’t know. But the new molecules done by photosynthesis in/by a unicellular must be exothermic. And as exothermic is affiliated with an expansion of the volume...

The cosmos pumps molecules at the poles and where the hurricane would be.

These molecules will feed the Van Allen radiation belt. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt .

Where is that heat layer compare to these belts, I don’t know. But the basic model, I would see, is that the weakness is at the poles. So the gush-in is there, at the poles. But, as photosynthesis cycle has weak points, hurricane will become a new region where the planet faces the cosmos, where the cosmos grasps heat and matter. When hurricane is done there is a loss to the cosmos of gases, and that generates the winds but how. Those winds are different; but I can’t specify.
There is as a system moving with the hurricane as its center. Any portion of the earth vegetation will have a different moon light reflection and attraction, so there is variation in photosynthesis according to the geographic position. And where photosynthesis is the weakest begins the hurricane. And the hurricane will move, it will follow the non-photosynthesis production.

Jet Stream.
And how is the Jet Stream affected by photosynthesis. Jet Stream is continuous. But when there is no Jet Stream, on that longitude there had been visits of tornadoes. Make your own observations of the Jet Stream at: http://squall.sfsu.edu/crws/jetstream.html . Each patch of vegetation is under different day light, moon light and moon attraction; that produce different output of the vegetation photosynthesis. So, all around the planet their productions will meet in the upper atmosphere, and over the poles. There is a resultant or stationary wind. Jet Stream is the front: warfront between the north production and the south production. So, no jet stream is no photosynthesis output; then tornadoes have a backdoor to earth surface.

Polar Ice Cap.
Jet stream and the thickness of the polar cap are two realities. Some say that polar ice cap has melted. You see by hot summer day, may be nice temperature is sufficient to give heat. But as the ice do melt at 0° Celsius and the sea is colder, all the heat will be sucked by the sea. So, in the hottest day, go there; make a hole in the ice and you would see ice reforming in a short time; if I am right. Would the ice cap being melted, the St-Lawrence River would have had to have a winter with no ice.

What is happening is that the snow fails to get there.

We may have the control over Jet Stream inadequacy and dwarfing North Pole ice cap. To prime a forest: WITH THINNING, TREE TRIMMING, TREE-SEED PLANTING AND PRESCRIBED BURNING.

Sincerely yours, Pierre Verville Jardinier forestier.

with the help of microsoft word

to my mother